What Makes a Deal Investable (and Why Most Aren’t)
Deal flow is abundant. Discipline is rare. We outline the specific criteria that separate opportunities we pursue from the hundreds we pass on each year.
- Investability is defined by what happens under stress—not by base-case projections
- Refinancing risk is the most underestimated structural vulnerability in today’s market
- We decline the majority of opportunities we review because most deals fail on structure, not on asset quality
Leverage: The Line Between Upside and Structural Risk
Leverage is the most direct expression of risk tolerance in real estate investing. Every lender sets limits. Every sponsor chooses a capital structure. The question is not whether to use leverage—it is how much leverage can be sustained through volatility without triggering a forced sale.
A deal financed at 75% LTV with floating-rate debt and a two-year maturity is not a leveraged investment. It is a refinancing gamble disguised as real estate. The asset may perform. The operations may execute. But if debt markets tighten at maturity, the sponsor is left negotiating extensions at punitive rates or selling into weakness.
We focus on leverage not as a way to amplify returns, but as a test of durability. Conservative LTV (typically 60–65%) paired with fixed-rate, long-term debt eliminates the binary outcome of a refinancing event. This is not about avoiding risk—it is about avoiding risks that do not pay us to take them.
Refinancing Risk in the Current Cycle
The maturity wall is not just a macro trend—it is the primary structural risk we evaluate. A deal that leans on a two-year bridge or a floating-rate bullet is exposed to refinancing volatility. Markets that were liquid in 2021 are more selective today, and lenders are demanding stronger coverage.
We require underwriting that extends beyond the first debt reset. Our scenarios explicitly model the refinancing outcome: rate, coverage, proceeds, and timing. If the deal fails in this scenario, it fails in the market.
Covering conservative DSCRs with realistic cash flow and validating liquidity sources is more important than chasing the densest money-on-money multiple.
- Run bridge-case, stabilization-case, and stress-case refinancing scenarios
- Require equity to survive the stress-case without further fundraising
- Avoid floating-rate structures that reprice before stabilized NOI is proven
Operations and Alignment Matter More Than Narrative
The best story in the market is worthless if the property cannot execute. We dig into the sponsor’s operating plan, the team’s track record, and the alignment of incentives.
Execution is not just “doing the physical work.” It is about communicating with lenders, navigating permitting, and keeping reserves intact. Misalignment here often forces equity to inject unplanned capital or take a loss.
We partner with operators who have lived through multiple cycles and have clear escalation paths for challenges. That alignment protects time and capital.
Sooch Capital Filters
- We only underwrite to stress scenarios that include refinancing outcomes
- Every deal must generate cash flow that covers conservative debt and reserves
- Sponsors must demonstrate cycle-tested discipline
Important Disclosures
- Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk of loss, including principal.
- This material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offering.